Your privacy, your choice

We use essential cookies to make sure the site can function. We also use optional cookies for advertising, personalisation of content, usage analysis, and social media.

By accepting optional cookies, you consent to the processing of your personal data - including transfers to third parties. Some third parties are outside of the European Economic Area, with varying standards of data protection.

See our privacy policy for more information on the use of your personal data.

for further information and to change your choices.

Skip to main content
Fig. 6 | CABI Agriculture and Bioscience

Fig. 6

From: Climate change mitigation and adaptation for rice-based farming systems in the Red River Delta, Vietnam

Fig. 6

Trade-offs and co-benefits of SRI interventions. Top row: fractional changes from all the baseline management systems under historical climate conditions for methane vs yield (a), fractional changes in methane vs WUE (b), and methane intensity vs absolute yield (c). Bottom row is the same as top row but for future climate conditions, where the increased number of points denote results from five (undifferentiated) climate models. The yellow areas on each plot show those management-sites that display co-benefits—or “win-wins”—for adaptation and mitigation. The values in the legend are the proportion of management-sites that fall in the green, co-benefit area, and ranges for the future climate show the maximum and minimum proportion across the five climate models

Back to article page