Gender analysis of chickpea (Cicer arietinum) yield gap: the case of Ada’a, Ethiopia

Table 1 collinearity statistics of independent variables

Model		Coefficients^a
		Unstandardized coefficients		Standardized coefficients	t	Sig	Collinearity statistics
		B	Std. error	Beta			Tolerance	VIF
1	(Constant)	4065.674	382.817		10.620	< .001
	Sex	− 272.546	161.786	− .108	− 1.685	.093	.753	1.287
	Age	− 596.39***	100.770	− .309	− 5.918	< .001	.759	1.318
	Education	39.87	54.945	.035	.726	.469	.883	1.132
	Land allocated for chickpea in 2011/12	− 395.63***	163.546	− .122	− 2.419	.016	.808	1.238
	Labor resources	213.072	126.315	.083	1.687	.093	.852	1.174
	Type of chickpea produced in 2011/12	− 35.643	131.763	− .014	− .271	.787	.826	1.210
	Fertility of Chickpea land	− 650.95***	148.402	− .223	− 4.386	< .001	.799	1.251
	Frequency plough	− 297.35***	69.922	− .202	− 4.253	< .001	.917	1.091
	Keep chickpea	− 90.050	124.374	− .035	− .724	.470	.864	1.158
	Chemical use	321.209	616.020	.024	.521	.602	.949	1.054
	Ox ownership	94.51**	39.415	.132	2.398	.017	.685	1.460
	Membership of farmers' association	− 451.40***	160.848	− .171	− 2.806	.005	.974	1.038
	Extension services	− 832.201	137.23***	− .328	− 6.064	< .001	.756	1.148

^aDependent Variable: total amount of chickpea produced per allocated land in 2011/12 in kg
^*** = Significance at p < 0.01, ** = Significance at p < 0.05, * = Significance at p < 0.1

ISSN: 2662-4044