Your privacy, your choice

We use essential cookies to make sure the site can function. We also use optional cookies for advertising, personalisation of content, usage analysis, and social media.

By accepting optional cookies, you consent to the processing of your personal data - including transfers to third parties. Some third parties are outside of the European Economic Area, with varying standards of data protection.

See our privacy policy for more information on the use of your personal data.

for further information and to change your choices.
Skip to main content

Table 4 Pearson correlation coefficient for regeneration and early growth parameters

From: In vivo regeneration efficiency of enset (Ensete ventricosum (Welw.) Cheesman) as affected by age of parent plant and corm proportion

 

DC

DE

SN

SH

LL

LW

LN

SPH

SPC

DC

 

0.77*

− 0.63**

− 0.246ns

− 0.28ns

− 0.22ns

− 0.42ns

− 0.39ns

− 0.01ns

DE

 

1

− 0.64**

0.02ns

− 0.02521ns

− 0.13832ns

− 0.11907ns

− 0.12896ns

− 0.11326ns

SN

  

1

0.31161ns

0.50092ns

0.27047ns

0.51507ns

0.41474ns

0.14707ns

SH

   

1

0.85**

0.75**

0.94**

0.84981**

− 0.78487**

LL

    

1

0.76**

0.85270**

0.82505**

− 0.59404**

LW

     

1

0.70194**

0.60841**

− 0.77448**

LN

      

1

0.89160**

− 0.61896**

SPH

       

1

− 0.60907**

SPC

        

1

  1. ns, *, ** indicate non-significant, significant at 5% and 1%probabilitylevel respectively
  2. DC Date to callus formation, DE Days to 50%emergence, SN Shoot Number, SH Sucker Height, LL Leaf Length, LW Leaf Width, LN Leaf Number, SPH Sucker pseudo-stem height, SPC Sucker pseudo-stem circumference
Back to article page

CABI Agriculture and Bioscience

ISSN: 2662-4044